Draft for review. Not launched. The text and the data can change.

Brighton & Hove City Council

Brighton & Hove City Council: the register

Decision notice FER0187769

Folio 571

Finding: Fault found

Decision by section
  • EIR 12(4)(e): Upheld
  • EIR 5: Upheld
  • EIR 5: Upheld
Service
Information requests: EIR 12(4)(e); EIR 5
Council
Brighton & Hove City Council
Body
Information Commissioner's Office
Decided
Summary
The complainant requested a copy of a memorandum sent to the City Planner from members of the planning department expressing concern about pressure put on planning staff in relation to the King Alfred development at Brighton & Hove. The complainant also asked for a copy of the City Planner’s response. The council withheld the information via regulations 12(4)(e) and 13(1) of the EIR. The complainant appealed and in addition requested a copy of any other documents relating to what the council did in response to the memorandum. On review the council maintained that the exceptions at 12(4)(e) and 12(5)(f) applied to both requests. During the Commissioner’s investigation the council declared that exceptions at 12(5)(b) and12(5)(f) also applied to the first request. The Commissioner found that the council had incorrectly applied the exceptions and had failed to comply with regulations 5(1), 5(2) and 14(3)(a) of the EIR. The Commissioner ordered disclosure of the information.
As published by the Information Commissioner's Office.

A decision notice can order steps and a time limit. The hub does not list them yet. Read the notice.